## Archive for ‘Data’

December 18, 2011

## Polish Resources – Cobbled from Ancestry.com/PGSA.org and Family Search – #Polish, #Genealogy

Stanczyk, put together a couple of pieces to make a NEW and useful Polish Genealogy database. First off, my email box had a weekly email from Ancestry.com.  This week’s Weekly Discovery is a boon for Polish Genealogists …

U.S. and Poland, Catholic Parish Marriage Index, Polish Genealogical Society of America,
1767–1931

Ok, the above link takes you to Ancestry’s newest database index (http://search.ancestry.com/search/db.aspx?dbid=70048&enc=1) .  Which as the Link Name suggests is a Polish Catholic Parish Marriage Index. I was excited until I discovered that it was really just a re-issue of the PGSA.org ‘s  database: http://www.pgsa.org/CzuchMarAll.php . So if you are not a subscriber to Ancestry, you could just go to PGSA and use their database and get the same results. The PGSA even gives an LDS Microfilm #. So Stanczyk took note of an Anna Eliasz marrying Leon Zielinski in 1910 and the LDS MF#: 1578072 . I made a vow to look that record up in the LDS microfilm. So I was in the LDS Library Catalog verifying the microfilm # was correct and LO and BEHOLD (why is it always LO and BEHOLD — and not just BEHOLD), the Library Catalog says the images are online!!! They even provided a link:

https://www.familysearch.org/search/image/index#uri=https%3A//api.familysearch.org/records/collection/1452409/waypoints

Now thankfully the database did specify 1910 and that the church was St. Stanislaus Kostka and even the Page# 204 was helpful. I used those pieces of info and the Family Search link to go to their web page:

• Illinois, Chicago, Catholic Church Records, 1833-1925

I selected the St. Stanislaus Kostka (Chicago) to go to the web page:

From there,  I picked Marriages, 1910-1915 (you need a free login to use their databases) and browsed the images until I got to page# 204 (which was actually image # 109 of 897) and on the left hand page was Leon Zielinski & at the bottom Anna Eliasz marriage record from the church. I got the actual date and parent names (including mother’s maiden name). See below …

I am not certain that Anna Eliasz is a relative or not because it did not provide the parish where Anna was born (and I seriously doubt Anna was born in Chicago in 1882). Her mother’s maiden gives me hope as that name does appear in my ancestral villages, so now I will have to find an Anna Eliasz birth record (or not) in Biechow/Pacanow parishes with parents Jan Eliasz & Mary Jurek.

The point of today’s article is that by joining the index in PGSA.org (or Ancestry.com) and using the index data with the browseable images from FamilySearch.org I was able to pull a new Church Parish record quite easily without leaving my house. It is the combination of the two resources from two separate websites that make a new and very useful tool. What do you think?

If you have Chicago ancestors (and in particular Polish ones) then you have an early Christmas or Chanukah Present. Drop me a comment of thanks, will ya?

Merry Christmas & Happy Chanukah and just in case,  Happy Holidays to the rest of my readers.

December 17, 2011

## A Little Bit of Blog Bigos … #Genealogy, #Website #Rankings, #SSDI

Stanczyk has a lot of catch-up to do. I blame it on the season and the Blood Red Lunar Eclipse — certainly that must be cause of the madness this December.

## SSDI

So many blogs have written about the Social Security Death Master File and the many related issues. First millions of records were dropped by the SSA. Next the SSA, and this has probably been going on for months, started redacting the names of the parents on the SS5 Applications, thus eliminating the usefulness of that research tool. Now Congress has bullied the paid genealogy databases (and even Rootsweb) to drop the SS# from their databases on deaths in the last ten years. Rootsweb just dropped their Social Security Database altogether!

Now let me remind the lame (not lame duck) Congress that the Social Security Death Master File is used to inform banks/financials/loan companies/credit card companies etc. that these SS#’s are of the DECEASED and that they should not grant any NEW credit applications with the Social Security Numbers in the Social Security Death Master File! Ergo, having the SS# of a dead person should not avail any criminal and should in fact result in their arrest for fraud, as the afore mentioned companies are supposed to check the Social Security Death Master File against credit apps. Therefore, there is really is no need to  eliminate the SS#’s from Ancestry.com or any other database. By eliminating these numbers you cannot order the SS5 Applications — which is just as well since the SSA has made them much less useful. The result is: genealogists have less data available and the US Government has less MONEY($) available since the genealogists now have two reasons not to order the SS5 Applications any longer. The result is the US Government will now lose another source of income??? Boy, is this CONGRESS the biggest bunch of idiots or what? ## Eastmans / Website Rankings Dick Eastman’s Online Newsletter recently wrote about new website rankings and gave the URL/Link to a Anglo/Celtic website. Needless to say this is the website that caused this jester to produce a BETTER set of website rankings (please see my page above or at Genealogy Website Rankings). I ask you to please utilize my Genealogy Rankings as they are based upon resources in more common use in the USA (and Canada), such as SteveMorse.org or EllisIsland.org or CastleGarden.org or any Polish-related website or blog. So I am compelled — not because I am as popular as EOGN.com (#12), vs Stanczyk (#120). But clearly leaving off the Steve Morse, or Ellis Island or the US NARA or Fold3 is not accurate in the USA and certainly NOT in the GLOBAL Genealogy market as a whole. Now this is foremost a blog about Slavic Genealogy (Russian-Poland overtly emphasized) and so I have made an effort to seek out and reflect Polish websites of Polish Genealogy websites/blogs (when their popularity reflects the need). I have intentionally not included GENPOL.com because its Global Ranking is too low. It is a very well known website to Polish Genealogists and I am sure in Poland itself it would be in the top 125 (just not Globally). So while this blog has a certain voice, my website rankings deserve as much attention as those that Dick Eastman writes about. Perhaps one day EOGN.com will notice this blog and its Genealogy Website Rankings List — you my faithful readers can help me by emailing Dick Eastman and informing him about my set of Genealogy Website Rankings which is very thorough and includes the Top 125 Genealogy Websites — including Polish & American & Jewish (re NonAnglo-Celtic) websites too. EOGN should not be allowed to perpetuate its blind-spot to other genealogies. Now let me hasten to add the other Rankings does in fact mostly agree with my own Rankings on the top 10 or 20 Genealogy Websites — his Rankings lack Polish/American/Jewish sites and my own Rankings miss a few Anglo websites and all of Ancestry.com’s other country sites (UK, CA, DE, AU, etc.) — which should probably be aggregated into Ancestry.com but due to their many domains their totals are segregated by Alexa (ratings agency) and this jester chose not to include so many Ancestry.com properties in the Rankings (which would exclude so many other worthy websites). As before, let me remind new genealogists that this Genealogy Website Ranking could be utilized to create or augment your genealogy Bookmarks/Favorites. Obviously, they are valuable since a LOT of genealogists visit them. ## MOCAVO I forgot to mention about Mocavo.com (I put it into the newest Genealogy Website Rankings). I have briefly mentioned Mocavo.com before (when I found them in my blog analytics). They are a new search engine, akin to Google. However, they are a Genealogy Search Engine and as such is enhanced to understand GEDCOM, genealogy, dates, places, etc. and their search results are more intensely accurate then say what you would get from Google. They also have the ability search databases and include those in results, as well as GEDCOMs. You have the ability to submit your family tree (GEDCOM) to Mocavo and they can provide you with notices of potential new matches — much like Ancestry.com does for their subscribers. So instead of Googling you Family Tree, try MOCAVOing your Family Tree. December 6, 2011 ## An Open Letter to: Jim Delany (Big 10), John D. Swofford (ACC), Larry Scott (PAC 12) To: Jim Delany (Big 10) John D. Swofford (ACC) Larry Scott (PAC 12) An Open Letter to: Jim Delany (Big 10), John D. Swofford (ACC), Larry Scott (PAC 12) 12/6/2011 Re: BCS Poll You should immediately quit the BCS. It is rigged against you and your three conferences. If you read my letter then you should see from my analysis, that the “computer polls” are inherently biased (and perhaps worse than the two human polls that make up the other 2/3 of the BCS rankings). First off, I used the Human Polls (Harris Poll & USA Today/ESPN) as the normative index. If you say this ok then you can accept my analysis. If you reject it, then you should be pitting LSU against Oklahoma State in the BCS Championship Bowl Game, because that is what the Computer Polls would have made the result if there were no human polls as a part of the BCS Index. My analysis clearly shows that the computer polls OVERWHELMINGLY favor the BIG12 and have a strong bias in favor of the SEC too. At the same time it is OVERWHELMINGLY rigged against the BIG 10 and strongly biased against the ACC and the PAC 12 conferences. The analysis shows that the Big 10, ACC and the PAC 12 would have to overcome a huge bias by the computer polls via the Human Polls to have any chance to reach the BCS Championship Game. You should realize that by selecting the SEC every year to play in the BCS Championship Game, you keep the bias in the computer polls and it will become a self-fulfilling prophecy each and every year. That means the BIG Money will continue to flow unchecked into the SEC (and also to lesser degree to the BIG 12) as it is a “virtuous cycle” upwards for these two conferences who get the best recruits and booster money because they are ALWAYS in the BCS Championship Game. Now that you have given in to the precedent of two teams from the same conference in the BCS Championship Game (should be a rule against this) you will see a heavy bias to that year after year, since that is all new recruits will see and the “virtuous cycle” will persist. Also, did you realize that the computer and the human polls will emphasize the next year’s polls based upon the previous year, via the pre-season polls? The root cause you will see is that two computer polls in particular: Kenneth Massey & Jeff Sagarin strongly overemphasize Big 12 teams and SEC teams also have a strong positive bias, while at the same time, these two same computer polls also demonstrate an under-emphasis of the Big 10 and a strong negative bias against the ACC and PAC 12. The effect is what we have seen for the last few years and culminating in this years SEC-only Championship. If you want to keep the BCS Polls, then you will need to do five things to improve them and their perception as fair: 1. Make a rule that the BCS Championship can NEVER have two teams from the same conference. This should be self evident. 2. Make the remaining computer polls submit their algorithms to an audit before the season starts and a week before/after the final BCS rankings \to ensure that these computer algorithms are “bias free” from human intervention and that the same results are achieved in the before/after of the final rankings (i.e no tampering and results are reproducible i.e. no randomness). 3. You must get rid of one or both of Kenneth Massey of Jeff Sagarin computer polls. The dual combination skews the biases in favor of BIG12/SEC and against the BIG10/ACC/PAC12. If you only get rid of one, then the initial removal should be Jeff Sagarin. The two computer polls show the same bias and are merely echoes of each other thus giving them an undue advantage over the other four computer polls. The Jeff Sagarin poll is merely MORE pronounced (in its biases) than the Kenneth Massey poll. 4. No 4 loss or 5 loss TEAM can ever be eligible for a BCS Bowl Game. You need this rule to prevent obvious bias from contaminating the system. 5. No 2 loss TEAM can play in the BCS Championship Bowl Game (substitute the next highest ranked team that does not violate rules 1 & 5). Mind you the Anderson & Hester computer poll exhibits some bias too, but it at least it is not in COMPLETE lock step with the Kenneth Massey or Jeff Sagarin polls. Otherwise, please dismantle the BCS system and just have 4 super football conferences and take the conference champion from each and have these four teams play a semi-final and a final game to determine the national champion fairly. See the attached spreadsheet data, cut/pasted into the next page and do you your own analysis to validate my findings and see if you reach the same conclusion. Please pay special attention to TEXAS in the final rankings if you wish to be totally disgusted by the computer polls – there is no mathematics that can justify that conclusion by computers, unless there is a BIG12 bias. The computer polls would have made TEXAS, a 7-5 team, the 19th ranked team overall in the whole country and the two offending computer polls would have made TEXAS 13th in the country and eligible for a BCS at Large Bowl Game. Can you imagine? Only TEXAS and AUBURN (BIG12 & SEC) have 5 losses in the BCS Top 25. In fact there are no other 5 loss or any 4 loss teams! Someone should commend the Richard Billingsley, Colley Matrix and Peter Wolfe computer polls for their ability to keep bias from skewing their rankings. Anderson & Hester can and should do better in their computer algorithm.  2011 FINAL BCS POLL Human Polls A/H RB CM KM JS PW Comp Polls Comp Diff Diff Summ LSU SEC 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 BAMA SEC 2 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 3 -1 -4 OKLA St B12 3 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 4 Stanford P12 4 0 0 -1 -4 -6 -3 5 -1 -14 Oregon P12 5 -7 0 -3 -5 -4 -1 8 -3 -20 Arkansas SEC 6 -1 -2 -6 1 2 2 5 1 -4 Boise St MWC 7 -2 1 0 -6 -6 -1 9 -2 -14 Kans. St B12 8 3 1 4 4 3 3 4 4 18 SCaro SEC 9 -1 1 -2 0 1 0 10 -1 -1 Wisc B10 10 -5 0 -5 -6 -9 -2 14 4 -27 VaTech ACC 11 -2 0 -2 -3 -10 -6 13 2 -23 Baylor B12 12 1 2 -5 2 6 5 11 -1 11 UMich B10 13 2 -3 4 -6 -9 -5 15 2 -17 OKLA B12 14 8 5 8 7 8 4 7 -7 40 Clemson ACC 15 -4 0 -3 -5 -2 2 16 1 -12 Georgia SEC 16 2 -4 0 5 5 2 12 -4 10 Mich St. B10 17 -3 4 -4 -7 -7 -5 21 4 -22 TCU MWC 18 -4 4 -1 -5 0 3 17 -1 -3 Houston CUSA 19 3 0 5 -2 -6 0 18 -1 0 Nebraska B10 20 3 2 3 -5 -3 0 19 -1 0 So. Miss CUSA 21 25 -1 -1 25 25 5 24 3 78 Penn St. B10 22 1 1 2 25 25 -1 23 1 53 West VA Beast 23 25 25 -1 25 25 25 25 2 124 Texas B12 24 7 25 2 11 11 0 19 -5 56 Auburn SEC 25 0 1 25 8 11 4 21 -4 49 -7 11 -8 -35 -37 -2 -17 -78 Skew By Conference ACC -6 0 -5 -8 -12 -4 -35 B10 -2 4 0 -24 -28 -13 -63 B12 20 7 10 25 28 12 102 PAC12 -7 0 -4 -9 -10 -4 -34 SEC -1 -5 -9 13 19 8 25 Source: 12/5/2011 Philadelphia Inquirer Final BCS Standings The bottom five teams were unranked in one or more computer polls making their data unfit for some of the analyses – these were not used in the bottom analysis of Skew By Conference. December 3, 2011 ## Parish Church Books (Registers) in Poland .. An Update Stanczyk has previous written in one of his memes (“Use Polish Websites” #5) about the website called Parish Church Books (http://www.ksiegi-parafialne.pl/). Well on the Facebook page for the Polish Genealogical Society (in Poland) [written in Polish] was a mention of an update of the Parish Church Books website. It appears that our Polish breathren were very industrious in November and there were a great many updates. ## For Example on 28th-November-2011:  woj. świętokrzyskie Działoszyce chrzty, małżeństwa, zgony Geneteka Gierczyce chrzty Geneteka Jędrzejów małżeństwa Geneteka on 23rd-November-2011:  woj. świętokrzyskie Bogoria chrzty Geneteka Jedrzejów małżeństwa Geneteka on 14th-November-2011:  woj. świętokrzyskie Bogoria chrzty, małżeństwa, zgony Geneteka Grzymałków chrzty, małżeństwa, zgony Geneteka Koprzywnica chrzty Geneteka Obiechów chrzty, małżeństwa Geneteka Pińczów małżeństwa Geneteka Tumlin chrzty, małżeństwa, zgony Geneteka And those were just the last half of November and just for the Wojewodztwo (woj.) Świętokrzyskie (formed from the old former woj. Kieleckie) where Stanczyk’s ancestors were from. Just about all woj. are represented as having changes, so it is worth a look no matter which partition(Russian, Austrian, Prussian) of occupied Poland you have ancestors in. Please see the bottom of Stanczyk’s former article for a listing of what each database abbreviation means and where it is found. ## P.S. Happy Birthday today for Joseph Conrad (aka Korzeniowski h. Nałęcz) the great author! December 2, 2011 ## Family Search Website – Free Central / Eastern European Records – #Genealogy, #Slavic Stanczyk was checking out the family search European Holdings for Slavic record counts / images to see what progress was made up through 2011. It is good if your heritage includes the Germanic peoples or locales which were previously under their dominion. Do not get me wrong. I am thrilled that there now over a million Polish records/images online or indexed at FamilySearch.org.  Country Records Percentage Austria 196,940 0.37 Czech Republic 85,469 0.16 Germany 50,998,675 96.98 Hungary Browsable Images Only 0.00 Poland 1,002,155 1.91 Russia 303,146 0.58 Slovakia Browsable Images Only 0.00 Ukraine 14,143 0.03  TOTALS: 52,586,385 We have the ability to better. Please consider volunteering as an indexer. You can start and stop and start again, your volunteering at any time. Find out more at indexing.familysearch.org. Every little bit helps. Stanczyk managed to do over 150 records this year. Genealogy is collaborative. Helping each other, we also help ourselves. Please pitch in — make this part of your Random Act of Genealogical Kindness efforts. November 25, 2011 ## Books, eBooks, and More Books – Bibliophiles/Bibliophages Beware !!! #Books Stanczyk is very old … My portrait by Jan Matejko dates back to 1862 alone. So perhaps you can forgive me if I blog about an antiquarian notion today … BOOKS. First off, I hope everyone had a Blessed and Family/Food Filled Thanksgiving Holiday (4th Thursday in November in the USA). As I was saying I want to write about books today. I provided a handy photo for the reference of my younger readers who may need a refresher on the concept. Before you run off … Here’s my list: No Amazon.com or Barnes & Noble today, although they are worthy purveyors — nor will I speak of Antiquarian Books, though I reserve that topic for another day. Google Books (books.google.com/books) – I adore to find public domain books or snippets of books under copyright that I can search and perhaps get at least a snippet view of my search topic. Google now lets you keep the public domain books on their “Cloud” (no space on your hard disk). At present, my Google eBooks include: Historya Polska w Ameryce by Wacław Kruszka. So you can find resources that are valuable to your genealogical or history research. Although you cannot download them to your iPhone, it is still portable since it is in the “Cloud” (enough with that Internet meme). So as long you can surf the web with your iPhone (or other smartphone) your genealogical resources are portable. Google Books will also help you locate the book in a local library (or the closest library) or help you locate it via their cadre of booksellers in case you still need that tactile sense of holding a book or where an eBook is not an option. They also have magazines too! Feel free to browse (get some good Sumatra coffee ready). The Internet Archive (http://www.archive.org/details/texts) is more than just books. It also about the Web, Moving Images, Texts (books), and Audio. All intriguing in their own right. In fact, the Web portion has the infamous Wayback Machine for viewing websites as they used to be. As I read somewhere this month, the average website changes about every 28 days. Obviously, blogs skew that average. So in a sense, the Wayback Machine backs up the Internet or should I say the “Cloud”. Oops, I did promise to stop dropping that meme today. But books are what we are about today. Obviously, they get their books from Libraries and also Project Gutenberg. Also it should be obvious that these are public domain books. They store each book in a variety of formats (HTML, PDF, and various ebook formats). So you can download a book to your laptop and import that into your iBooks App (or whatever smartphone App you use) for true portability. Classics .. check, Genealogy/History .. check, Children’s Books .. double check, and Foreign Language Books too. What eBooks are on your smartphone? Perhaps we should ask that question to the famous (instead of what music is on your iPhone). Don’t be embarrassed .. go to the Internet Archive or the Next Topic (Project Gutenberg). Project Gutenberg – has been around a long time. But it has taken eBook formats, eBook readers and smartphones to bring this valuable resource to major relevance. I daresay that most smartphone Apps that have free books, probably use this website. Project Gutenberg has 36,000 books to download. Skip those Apps, use the free iBooks App that came with your iPhone, Project Gutenberg to locate the books YOU care about, download the eBook format (epub or pdf work), import the book into iTunes, find some book cover art, and synch the whole package to your iPhone/iPad for true portability and reading on the beach or in that research archive or at the museum or that archaeology dig you have been promising yourself. LibraryThing (www.librarything.com) - You must be a bibliophile or bibliophage or why else are you reading this post. Well here is a website that is a bit different. LibraryThing will allow you to upload your library (200 books for free). Now you are not uploading books, but the data about the books or possibly its cover. You can enter the data or specify the ISBN and allow the website to locate the metadata that describes the book in your collection. If that is all it did, it would be mostly useful to libraries and librarians — which it is useful for and they provide a way to bulk load their entire catalogs. But it is a kind of social-network for bibliophiles or for authors trying to sell books to readers of their genre. I like the Zeitgeist feature for understanding what is out there. I also like to compare my books to others and wonder about what others users whose books overlap with my book collection are like and what that says about me. There are also book groups and local ties to bookstores, libraries, museums and other book events. There are so many ways to use this website collaboratively. Take a peak. Enjoy the books and the other book readers too! November 23, 2011 ## Genealogy Journals / Magazines – AVOTAYNU — #Polish, #Jewish, #Genealogy Stanczyk is always seeking out high quality resources that provide context for understanding and/or to provide ideas for new avenues of research. One of the great resources since about 1985, has been Avotaynu. Besides their journal of the same name which is the largest circulation magazine of Jewish Genealogy, they also publish many reference books for Eastern Europe that are of aid Jewish and Non-Jewish researchers alike. They maintain an index of their published issues (1985-2008) here (http://www.avotaynu.com/indexsum.htm). It is broken down by various countries. This material can also be found in back issues, libraries, and they offer a CD covering the entire 24 year span. This jester sat down to produce a Polish Index for Polish Genealogists of all stripes (Enjoy!):  # Title / Description ISSUE YEAR 1 Jewish records at the Genealogical Society of Utah II/1/03 1986 2 Index to Polish-Jewish records at Genealogical Society of Utah II/1/05 1986 3 Book review: The Jews in Poland and Russia–Biographical Essay III/1/38 1987 4 Origin of Russian-Jewish surnames III/2/03 1987 5 Breakthrough in access to Polish-Jewish records IV/1/10 1988 6 Book review: Jews of Posen in 1834 and 1835 IV/2/26 1988 7 Update on project to microfilm Jewish records in Poland IV/3/12 1988 8 Doing research in the Polish State Archives IV/3/21 1988 9 Jewish Historical Institute in Poland V/2/07 1989 10 Jewish genealogical research in Poland V/2/08 1989 11 Trip to Poznan: The Poland that was not V/3/16 1989 12 Professional genealogists in Poland V/4/04 1989 13 List of former Jewish residents of Lodz V/4/15 1989 14 Caricatures in Polish vital statistic records VI/1/16 1993 15 Polish trip for Jewish genealogists planned VI/1/41 1993 16 Using Prussian gazetteers to locate Jewish religious and civil records in Poznan VI/2/12 1993 17 Sephardic migrations into Poland VI/2/14 1993 18 A genealogical tour through Poland VI/3/16 1993 19 Program Judaica to document Jewish history VI/3/19 1993 20 Jewish researcher in Poland VI/3/39 1993 21 Jews in Poland today VI/4/63 1993 22 Polish maps available in the U.S. VIII/1/58 1993 23 Weiner discusses developments in Poland and Ukraine VIII/3/64 1993 24 A 1992 research trip to Poland VIII/4/12 1993 25 Survey of Jewish cemeteries yields results VIII/4/17 1993 26 Cites Polish “rip off” IX/1/65 1988 27 Asks why survey of Polish cemeteries does not include all regions IX/1/67 1988 28 Polish-Jewish genealogical research–A primer IX/2/04 1988 29 More on the survey of Polish cemeteries IX/2/13 1988 30 Book review: Korzenie Polskie: Polish Roots IX/2/61 1988 31 Polish-Jewish heritage seminar planned for July in Krakow IX/2/65 1988 32 Asks for clarification (of Polish-Jewish records) IX/3/66 1988 33 Stettin emigration lists found IX/3/67 1988 34 Head of the Polish State Archives clarifies policies IX/4/04 1988 35 Book review: Jews in Poland: A Documentary History IX/4/69 1988 36 More on Polish-Jewish Genealogical Research X/1/12 1994 37 Directory of Polish State Archives X/1/14 1994 38 Archives of the Jewish Historical Institute in Warsaw X/1/41 1994 39 Jewish genealogical research in Polish archives X/2/05 1994 40 Jewish surnames in the Kingdom of Poland X/2/15 1994 41 Polish sources at the Central Archives for the History of the Jewish People X/2/21 1994 42 Success in dealing with Polish archives X/2/48 1994 43 Gleanings from a symposium on bibliographies of Polish Judaica X/4/56 1994 44 Polish name lists sought XI/1/67 1995 45 Nineteenth-Century Congress Documents and the Jews of Congress Poland XI/3/24 1995 46 Polish Vital Records for the Very Beginner: The Polish Language Challenged XI/4/29 1995 47 Alternate surnames in Russian Poland XII/2/15 1996 48 Census records and city directories in the Krakow Archives XII/2/27 1996 49 Book review: The Jews in Poland and Russia: Bibliographical Essays XII/2/63 1996 50 Alternative research sources in Poland XII/2/65 1996 51 Jewish Historical Institute in Warsaw XII/3/51 1996 52 Director General of the Polish State Archives dies XII/3/55 1996 53 An interview with the new Polish State Archivist XII/4/03 1996 54 On-site Jewish genealogical research in Poland: an overview XII/4/04 1996 55 The Jewish cemetery in Warsaw XII/4/56 1996 56 Book review: Polish Countrysides: Photographs and Narrative XII/4/81 1996 57 German and Polish Place Names XIV/2/33 1998 58 List of More than 300,000 Polish Holocaust Survivors Received by USHMM In Wash. DC 19th- and 20th-Century Polish Directories as Resources for Genealogical Information XIII/1/25 1997 59 Hamburg Passengers from the Kingdom of Poland and the Russian Empire XIII/2/63 1997 60 Lw¢w Ghetto Records Being Indexed XIII/3/66 1997 61 Cites Location of Polish Directories XIII/4/98 1997 62 Jewish Roots in Poland: Pages from the Past and Archival Inventories; And I Still See Their Faces: Images of Polish Jews; Guide to the YIVO Archives; Luboml: Memorial Book of a Vanished Shtetl XIV/1/63 1998 63 Comments on Jewish Roots in Poland XIV/2/65 1998 64 Report on Jewish Communities in Poland Today XIV/2/65 1998 65 How I Found a New Ancestor in Krak¢w, Poland XIV/4/65 1998 66 18th-Century Polish Jewry: Demographic and Genealogical Problems XV/4/9 1999 67 Tips on Translating Entries from Slownik Geograficzny XVI/3/49 2000 68 The Polish Concept of Permanent Place of Residence XVI/3/12 2000 69 More About Polish Books of Residents’ Registration XVI/3/14 2000 70 Can Jewish Genealogists Successfully Research 18th-Century Poland? XVI/3/16 2000 71 History Book Illuminates Jewish Life in Poland XVI/3/40 2000 72 Book Review: History of the Jews in Poland and Russia XVI/3/65 2000 73 Book Review: In Their Words: A Genealogist’s Translation Guide to Polish, German, Latin and Russia Documents. Volume 1: Polish XVI/4/87 2000 74 Breaking New Ground: The Story of Jewish Records Indexing-Poland Project XVII/1/7 2001 75 Documenting the Fate of the Jews of Ostrow Mazowiecka XVII/3/19 2001 76 German and Polish Archival Holdings in Moscow XVII/4/11 2001 77 Internet Site Names Polish Towns XVII/4/79 2001 78 Researching Pre-1826 Vital Records in Congress Poland XVIII/2/19 2003 79 Book Review: Jewish Officers in the Polish Armed Forces, 1939-1945 XVIII/3/62 2003 80 Ashes and Flowers: A Family Trek to Jewish Poland and Romania XVIII/4/11 2003 81 Two Polish Directories Online XVIII/4/91 2003 82 Polish Passport Policy 1830-1930: Permits, Restrictions and Archival Sources XIX/1/21 1998 83 Book Reviews: Zród a archiwalne do dziejów Żydów w Polsce XIX/3/65 1998 84 Jewish Surnames in Russia, Poland, Galicia and Prussia XIX/3/28 1998 85 Using Polish Magnate Records for Posen XIX/3/25 1998 86 Avotaynu Online Database Lists Nobility Archives XIX/4/21 1998 87 Hidden Jews of Warsaw XX/1/47 2004 88 Polish archives in Bialystok, Knyszin and Lomza XX/2/50 2004 89 Polychromatic Tombstones in Polish-Jewish Cemeteries XX/2/39 2004 90 Tracing Family Roots Using JRI-Poland to Read Between the Lines XX/2/15 2004 91 Biographical lexicon of Polish rabbis and admorim XX/3/47 2004 92 Flatow Jewish Cemetery Tombstones Discovered XX/4/79 2004 93 Polish City Directories Now Online XXI/3/67 2005 94 Morgenthau Mission to Poland to Investigate the 1919 Pogroms: A Genealogical Resource XXII/2/14 2006 95 What Can We Learn from Slownik Geograficzny? XXII/2/31 2006 96 Spiritual Genealogy: A Look at Polish Notary Documentation XXII/2/38 2006 97 Notes Polish Book and Magnate Records XXII/3/63 2006 98 Exhibit of the Jews of Poznán, 1793–1939 XXIII/1/71 2007 99 Strategies for Assigning Surnames to Early JRI-Poland Records XXIII/2/22 2007 100 Book Review: Posen Place Name Indexes XXIV/1/51 2008 November 18, 2011 ## Mt Olivet Detroit, MI Cemetery – #Polish, #Genealogy Earlier in the week I had dropped a quick spreadsheet of some people in my family (or for whom I had performed a RAOGK). It also was accompanied by a map of the Mt Olivet Cemetery (shown to the left). Mt Olivet is part of the Mt Elliott Cemetery Association which is made up of the following cemeteries: Mt Elliott, Mt Olivet Resurrection All Saints Guardian Angel and The Preserve cemeteries. They also have an online database that you can search for your ancestor here: http://mtelliott.com/genealogy . The map seems to indicate that there are about 75-85 sections to the cemetery (Most are numbered, but the annex sections have Letters). I have section maps for Sections: 15, 24, 52 and L. These section maps have family names (probably of the original deed-holder family) written in the boxes. I would like to collect the entire set of section map pictures. So my plea to you, my readers is do you have a scanned map of any of the sections of Mt Olivet (Detroit) cemetery? If you have any or all of these Section Maps, then can you email these images (preferably in JPG/JPEG), but I will take any format you have. The image needs to be clear enough to read the names in the boxes. Let me show you an example (a portion) of what I am looking for: Ok readability is highly variable. Obviously they can write smaller than can be read. But what I am trying to do is read… “Pitlock”, Plot 1223, “Chojnaski”, Plot 1222, etc. These are sometimes called Plot Maps. The one here is a snippet from Section 15. The three most desired Section Maps are: Section 54 (where my father’s infant brother, Henry is buried) & Section 57 (where my grandfather Joseph is buried) and Section G where my aunt Sally and her son/my cousin Stephen is buried . Thanks Internet! November 15, 2011 ## Just Another Mt Olivet Monday # A bit late … # Mt Olivet Monday (Detroit, MI) Here is a list of family buried in Mount Olivet Cemetery on Vandyke Rd, in Detroit, MI. The last two rows are a bit of RAOGK that I did for Maureen Mroczek (whereby I sent her pictures) of her ancestors headstones. Here is a map of Mt Olivet Cemetery:  Death Date Last Name First Name Section Lot# / Tier# Grave 8/3/1967 Eliasz (Prusinski) Sabina F. G 1344 1/19/1963 Eliasz Stephen E Jr G 1355 1/29/1923 Eliasz Henry 54 16 346 1/6/1930 Eliasz Joseph 57 2 114 8/6/1981 Gawlikowski (Wlecial) Rose 15 1255 7/18/1943 Gawlikowski Adam 15 1255 5/15/1967 Wlecial Leon 15 1255 3/8/1961 Wlecialowski Boleslaw 15 1255 Mroczek Kazimier 51 41 945 Mroczek Mary Kozlowska 55 12 215 November 14, 2011 ## Fold3 – World War II Materials Free – 11/11/11 – 11/20/11 Stanczyk keeps forgetting to mention that FOLD3.com has some free databases through this Sunday coming up. Apparently, some of you already know the website appears to be busy. Nice gesture for Veterans Day! November 13, 2011 ## 1940 US Census Website – #Genealogy, #1940 Stanczyk noticed that genealogist, Ceil Wendt Jensen has been letting all genealogists know about a new website to help with the 1940 US Census (which arrives in April 2012). Here is the website: http://www.1940census.net/ . Have you prepared for the 1940 Census yet? If not, my prior article or Ceil’s link ,which has many resources, is a whole website that can help you prepare. Also, do not forget the Steve Morse.org website. Tags: , November 12, 2011 ## 2011 Year End Genealogy Website Rankings – Top 125 Websites Globally – #Global, #Genealogy, #Rankings Two months ago Stanczyk produced an analysis of Genealogical Website rankings after reading the Eastmans Online Genealogy Network blog about one from Canada??. Since that time, I have been monitoring my own blog’s rankings every month to see how I have been progressing and I am very thankful for you, my good readers. But before we close out the 2011 year, I wanted to have a final Global Top 125 Genealogy Websites ranking. The current global rankings include a link to the prior ranking, so you can compare for yourself. First off, let me say how I produced the survey. It is not like Family Tree Magazine’s Top 100 Genealogy Websites which “selects” their favorite 125 websites, by grabbing some from a variety of categories (African-American Genealogy, Jewish Genealogy, Big Genealogy Websites, etc.). Their breadth of “selections” is impressive and they range into reference websites too. Still every one of their selected websites is a valuable resource and the whole list could be used to form your own Genealogy Favorites (Bookmarks). To arrive at my surveys, last survey and this current survey, I used Alexa.com as my source for rankings. I gathered websites from all over the world and I used the GLOBAL RANKING. This is why we, in the USA may have some disagreements, as Alexa.com also keeps a ranking within the local country. The American rankings for the USA websites tend to be much higher than the foreign regions for us. Likewise, in Canada or the UK, their local genealogy websites tend to rank higher than USA websites because they tend to use their local resources. But in the USA everyone is from somewhere else, so we use USA websites and genealogy websites from around the entire Globe to do our research. Finally, since I use Alexa.com for the rankings, I have to accept that they may not have considered a website that might actually be about genealogy as being about something else, because the website did not specify or because they described their website as something else. Also Alexa.com does a very poor job of ranking websites outside the USA/Canada/UK unless they write in English. To compensate (modestly), I did add in two Polish genealogical websites and included their global rankings in the survey. After all, this is a blog about Polish Genealogy and other musings. I also added in a few odds & ends, such the the US National Archives (even though not all of the site is not genealogically related — Alexa does not allow for me to select a sub-site within Archive.gov). ## Findings The new websites, seem to be the ones I added. Some of the older websites no longer had data, so we see some with a ranking of: 99,999,999. This is not an accurate ranking but it must be well beyond 30Million and may now be in the 100Million range and as such, Alexa.com now ignores it or at least does not keep its data. Many of the top 50 Genealogy websites moved up and moved upwards a good bit. A very few of the Top 50 moved down slightly. So overall, it seems that Genealogy is becoming more popular (than all other websites in general). To give you some feel, this blog that you are reading right now, moved upwards some 6Million places. However, it only moved up four places on the Global Top 125 Genealogy Websites ranking. In the Top 10, there was very little movement. Most notable, was Fold3.com (formerly Footnote.com), the recent Ancestry.com acquisition moved to number 9 (up from #10) and Eastmans Online Genealogy Network moved up to #10 (from 17). The Top 10 also has one of the new websites (NARA) and MyHeritage.com (#2 — one of those websites that Alexa.com had not counted as a genealogy website, but which we included this time). ## Next Year I will begin dropping website that are ranked at or above 20Million to allow room for some new websites and to keep the list to 125. Please send me an email about any website that I should investigate for inclusion. I will publish the future Rankings on or about the 1st of: March, June, September, and December going forward. Thanks! November 3, 2011 ## Social Security Administration (SSA) changed the Death Master File (SSDI); #Genealogy, #Sources In a nice piece of Genealogical Journalism, Steve Danko (eminent Polish genealogist — see my blogroll on the right), posted about the Social Security Administration (SSA) changing its Death Master File (DMF), aka the Social Security Database or SSDI, that we use as a major source of genealogical data. Their change, which you can read about in Steve’s blog, took place on November 1st (two days ago) without much fanfare or any fore knowledge. Now as an IT Expert for the last quarter century, I understand the SSA’s rationale — it is a data privacy / legal issue. Its impact is immediate. 4.2 Million records have been deleted from the former 89 Million records (approximately 4.72%) and have vanished because it was “Sourced” from various US States (and not updated from those States’ records). This article is not about discussing the whys and what-nots of the SSA’s decision. This post is about the ramifications of that decision for genealogy. Two impacts are explicit. 4.2 Million source records disappeared. Going forward, 1 Million records per year will not be loaded (or is it more proper to say, will be in suspense until a source comes forward for that death). Let’s talk about the 4.2 Million records that disappeared 1-November-2011. Some percentage of those records were used in some genealogist’s family research and are documented therein. However, the source is now gone?? If you were diligent and documented the SSA’s DMF (aka SSDI) in your research and that record disappeared, then future researchers will be left wondering what happened. Is this researcher accurate? So, I propose that everyone use their favorite DMF/SSDI and verify their source is still there (or that it is gone). Furthermore, if it is gone, then I propose a note be entered in your source documentation of this “Event” that happened 11/01/2011 and that a reference back to the state where the death took place (and/or county) be mentioned as the place to get extant documentation and that the previous source documentation was removed by the US Government pursuant to this “Event”. Apparently, you will need to verify your DMF/SSDI source for ALL deaths from 2002 through to 11/01/2011. Before that , there are no changes that need to be verified. Use your family tree software, pull a report of deaths from 2002-2011 inclusive and work your way through the list. I think it is still a FACT. The death is still a FACT; but the evidence to support the FACT is now missing unless you have a death certificate or other source for the death date / place. That is why I propose a note be placed into your documentation of your sources. What you know, has NOT changed. How you know of the death has effectively been changed (rug pulled out from underneath you). There is so much more that could be discussed on this topic. But this much is my topic and the subject of this post. Good Luck and get started. –Stanczyk #### P.S. I guess to the litany of investigatory questions, we will now see/hear: … “What did you know? When did you know it? Do you still know it? November 2, 2011 ## Dziennik Polski, Detroit, MI – Index, Summary Update #HistoricalNewspaper Well Stanczyk have been busy for a few days, trying to update the Rootsweb page dedicated to the Dziennik Polski, Detroit, MI Polish Language Ethnic Newspaper. The Index page with the names has been updated with nearly 7,000 new names / dates from 1936. The Summary of all Dziennik Polski transcriptions now totals 48,217 of which 26,745 of those names are indexed and the summary page is here. The Index page is alphabetical by Last Name, First Name, Date of Newspaper (when the name appeared). Use your browser’s FIND capability (Ctrl-F in Windows, Cmd-F in Mac) to search for a name or just scroll the page. October 27, 2011 ## #Polish #Genealogy – Useful Websites … #7 Prussian Army’s Personnel Losses in World War I Stanczyk was reading his emails, when he noticed Ceil Wendt-Jensen has published a useful website on the various Polish / Michigan genealogy mailing lists. As the Article title suggests this is another database of military personnel from World War I. This one is unlike the ones you’d find at genealodzy.pl . It is however, similar to these databases and even links to the same Fallen in World War I website. But as I said this website/database is different from those. The aim of the Prussian Army project (link: http://www.genoroots.com/eng/databases.php) is to provide an easy way of searching through the Deutsche Verlustlisten. This is the Prussian Army’s Personnel Losses during World War I . The authors of the project: Aleksandra Kacprzak and Mariusz Zebrowski. They are still updating so check back from time to time. If you click on the “Prussian Army project” link above it will take you to its databases page. There under the ‘Prussian Army’ Heading you will see a link ‘Search’. Click on ‘search’ link. You should see the following search form: Fill in a name and click on the ‘Search’ button. That is it. Should you find an ancestor, you can email them for more info. There is a very modest charge for this follow-on service (the search is free, the detailed info is where the cost is). So if you find someone, then … e-mail: prusy22@wp.pl. When asking for further information, you must provide the ordinal number (‘L.P.’), the first and last name and the rank of the person in question. The additional information costs 2 Euro per name (=$2.82 as of 10/27/2011), payable via PayPal (to prusy22@wp.pl ). Stanczyk is not affiliated and has no conflict of interest in these entrepreneurial Poles. I did not find any of my ancestors, so I cannot tell you what details you may find. My ancestors were from the Russian-Poland partition (and hence would have been in the Russian army) — keep in mind this Prussian army (not Russian, not Austrian).

Good Luck! Please send me an email with a sample detail if you send for it. Thanks!

September 27, 2011

## Family Search Indexing Tool – #Genealogy – #Polish Radom 1866

Stanczyk wanted to take a moment to say, “Thanks”. You may recall I did my due diligence on the Genealogy Website Rankings. I added my own blog website for reference. At the time of the survey I was a little over 12.8 Million-th most popular website on the Internet. Out of the billions of pages, I thought that was a great start.

For kicks, I went to Alexa.com and inquired if my ranking had changed. I was pleasantly surprised to see that I was now the 10.3 Million-th most popular website. That is an improvement of 2.5 Million in about one month !   So I just wanted to say thanks. I am hoping to eventually crack the top 1 Milliion (with perhaps a dream of being in the top 100,000 some day). I asked for your support and I can definitely see that I received it. Thank You very much for lending me your eyes.

I am also looking for people to help me in my volunteer efforts. If you can read Polish (or even Russian, I saw two projects for Ukraine-Kiev church records), then you can join with me on one of two projects: Lublin and/or Radom. I chose Radom as it was close to my grandparent’s ancestral villages (Biechow/Pacanow).

Most projects are for English language records. Of those, many are in the USA, so you could pick your local area and get a local genealogy society or historical society to pitch in. It will provide more data for all of us to research. If you want to thank me, but only read English then perhaps you can pick from a project for: Philadelphia, Buffalo, Toledo, Detroit (or Michigan in general). This is another way you can lend me your eyes and feel good about doing some volunteer work (Random Act of Genealogical Kindness, anyone?).

Two Polish projects open at present.

As I said, I chipped in some effort to read one batch (of 12 birth church records). The records I was given in my first batch were from 1866 in the Radom diocese. This data (index and images) will be free to search from their website: FamilySearch.org (Europe Record Groups) .

Good Luck & Thanks again!

– Stanczyk

September 25, 2011

## #Genealogy #Polish – Searching ELA database, State Archives (Poland)

Stanczyk was visiting the State Archives in Poland website and he explained about the four databases:

• PRADZIAD – For vital records, both civil and religious. Birth,  Marriage, Death and Alegata records.
• SEZAM - A database containing  detailed descriptions of archival holdings preserved by the State Archives and a few related repositories. Some entries are rather lengthy.
• IZA – A catalog of all (really slightly more than a quarter of all) fonds, by archive that holds them and indexed by Key Words. It includes the Archive’s contact info (for each fond). I hope they get around to indexing the other 3/4 of fonds.
• ELA – A database of all population registers (Censuses, Lists, Indexes, etc.) in Poland’s State Archives.

When I wrote about ELA, I said it was not very useful. But I  wanted to correct my errant statement (due to my own misconception about what data they had available). By the descriptions, you can see that PRADZIAD is the most important to a genealogist, but that the ELA database with its population lists can provide additional opportunities to find an ancestor and in some context (a list of soldiers, those being deported, a census, eligible voters list, etc.) for some timeframe. Now let me hasten to add that in the Russian Partition of Poland you are not going to find much in the way of censuses — it seems you can find Russian Empire censuses in all Russian Gubernias, but the ten gubernias in the Polish Kingdom (of the Russian Empire, aka Congress Poland).

### Using ELA

This is the English language version of the ELA database (click on link to go to ELA) search form.

You can leave “Town” empty and just search on the “Register’s title” field. Here are some possible search strings (enter Polish words):

1. Listy osób
2. Listy osób uprawnionych do głosowania w guberni kieleckiej
3. listy osób deportowanych z Cesarstwa Rosyjskiego

The first is just the generic, “Lists of People”. All strings must be in Polish (get your Google Translator out). The diacriticals (accents) are not required. The second is the list of eligible voters (in Kielce Gubernia).  The third one is a list of people deported from the Russian Empire.

Leave town blank if you want to search all towns. Fill in town or gmina or powiat (if these are also town names) if you want to limit yourself to an area where you know your ancestors were from. You can also use “Register’s title” if you want to search a whole wojewodztwo (gubernia) and not just the town Kielce.

I have family from the Kielce Gubernia, so I clicked on “more” to find out what FOND and Archive has this data of interest to me (#2 of the list above).

So I should use the contact info to go to the Kielce State Archive and ask for FOND # 59 to see the list of eligible voters in Kielce Gubernia in 1906.

Perhaps I’ll find Elijasz, Leszczynski, Wlecial, and Kedzierski families listed among the eligible voters. From that era, my paternal grandparents are still there  and I expect  that I’d find my great-grandparents too. Now I do not know that I will find more than their names. But perhaps, I’ll get ages and addresses too. Who knows what else (military service, occupation, date of prior elections or number of elections voted — who knows).

There is no actual data or images online. It just a big library catalog file of what you can expect to find, if you visit or hire a genealogist to visit the State Archives.

September 23, 2011

## An Analysis of Biechow LDS Microfilm By Film/Year/Event

Its a rainy day today and Stanczyk threw himself at the unfinished Survey Spreadsheet of his grandmother’s ancestral village: Biechow (old woj./gubernia Kielce). So I made a pot of coffee and I started at the highest level.

My spreadsheet is for each of the years, 1792-1860 inclusive. So there is each year going down the leftside. I have each the three events: Birth, Marriage, Death (Urodzen, Malzenstwo, Zgonow) in separate columns. Please note in some years there are marriage banns (zapowiedz), so you may need to divide by three to get an idea of the actual number of marriages (round up to the next integer). The counts provided are the actual record counts in the church registers. For Biechow, I used LDS microfilm: 936660 .. 936664 inclusive (five film). Finally, I added a column of derived data, “Growth Rate”. This column is simply the number of births minus the number of deaths. Most years there is an increase. However, there are some negatives that show a population decrease. In one year (1831), I know for certainty, that there was a cholera epidemic. Hence a steep decrease in population in 1831. In other years, it may be pestilence/disease or it may be war or something else, but I have no info to explain the negative growth.