<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Security Administration (SSA) changed the Death Master File (SSDI); #Genealogy, #Sources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikeeliasz.wordpress.com/2011/11/03/social-security-administration-ssa-changed-the-death-master-file-ssdi-genealogy-sources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikeeliasz.wordpress.com/2011/11/03/social-security-administration-ssa-changed-the-death-master-file-ssdi-genealogy-sources/</link>
	<description>A Muse-ing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 22:56:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeeliasz</title>
		<link>http://mikeeliasz.wordpress.com/2011/11/03/social-security-administration-ssa-changed-the-death-master-file-ssdi-genealogy-sources/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikeeliasz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 10:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeeliasz.wordpress.com/?p=1638#comment-358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Family Tree Magazine, an Ancestry.com spokesman said they would NOT delete the 4.2 Million records in their database.   Hmmmmmm!  I wonder what other SSDI database owners will do. Surely, the US Government cannot make genealogists get rid of their documentation of the FACT of death. But what about people/organizations who took SSDI feeds??

This may mean we have to do this survey of 2002-2011 SSDI records  annually to see if/when an ancestor&#039;s supporting evidence is removed.

If we end up with two classes of SSDI databases, then I am sure corporations will use the Ancestry.com database (or others who do likewise) to detect dead people (to avoid fraud) rather than the US government DMF which 4.2Million records less complete. This could possibly turn into another income source for Ancestry.com besides their genealogist customers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Family Tree Magazine, an Ancestry.com spokesman said they would NOT delete the 4.2 Million records in their database.   Hmmmmmm!  I wonder what other SSDI database owners will do. Surely, the US Government cannot make genealogists get rid of their documentation of the FACT of death. But what about people/organizations who took SSDI feeds??</p>
<p>This may mean we have to do this survey of 2002-2011 SSDI records  annually to see if/when an ancestor&#8217;s supporting evidence is removed.</p>
<p>If we end up with two classes of SSDI databases, then I am sure corporations will use the Ancestry.com database (or others who do likewise) to detect dead people (to avoid fraud) rather than the US government DMF which 4.2Million records less complete. This could possibly turn into another income source for Ancestry.com besides their genealogist customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
