<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biechow Parish 1814 Marriages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikeeliasz.wordpress.com/2011/01/04/biechow-parish-1814-marriages-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikeeliasz.wordpress.com/2011/01/04/biechow-parish-1814-marriages-2/</link>
	<description>A Muse-ing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 22:56:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeeliasz</title>
		<link>http://mikeeliasz.wordpress.com/2011/01/04/biechow-parish-1814-marriages-2/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikeeliasz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeeliasz.wordpress.com/?p=334#comment-69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are there 1 or 2 or even 3 record #&#039;s for each marriage?

This year in the church books it had both banns (Zapowiedz) and the actual marriage record itself. The usual course was 1st Bann, 2nd Bann, Marriage Record

Sometimes you did not have a marriage record (so you might see just two records #&#039;s). Possibly only the marriage record itself was recorded (so only a single record #).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are there 1 or 2 or even 3 record #&#8217;s for each marriage?</p>
<p>This year in the church books it had both banns (Zapowiedz) and the actual marriage record itself. The usual course was 1st Bann, 2nd Bann, Marriage Record</p>
<p>Sometimes you did not have a marriage record (so you might see just two records #&#8217;s). Possibly only the marriage record itself was recorded (so only a single record #).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
